How Product Photography Became a Billion-Dollar Growth Market – Daily Business

For most shoppers, the product page is the new shop window. On a phone screen, there is no friendly sales assistant, no chance to pick up a shoe or turn a gadget over in your hands. There are pictures, maybe a video, and a price. Unsurprisingly, the money has followed the pixels. Market researchers now estimate that dedicated product photography services are worth around 0.86 billion US dollars in 2025 and will grow to more than 2.2 billion by 2034, driven largely by ecommerce demand and AI assisted workflows.

At the sharper end of that trend sits ecommerce product photography, a smaller but fast growing segment. Verified Market Research values this niche at about 164 million dollars in 2023 and expects it to reach more than 340 million by 2031, implying double digit annual growth. In other words, what used to be a line item inside commercial photography has become its own market with its own tools, agencies and job titles.

The reason is simple. When customers cannot touch, smell or try, images do most of the persuasion. A 2025 Orbitvu report on fashion ecommerce, drawing on several external studies, notes that 90 percent of online shoppers say photo quality is the most important factor in their buying decisions. Products with professional images see roughly 33 percent higher conversion rates than those with weaker visuals, and 22 percent of returns happen because the item looks different from the photos. If you care about margin, these are not design details; they are economics.

Note
Product photography has shifted from “nice to have” branding asset to measurable revenue driver, with its own budgets, KPIs and specialist roles.

Why do product photos now decide ecommerce success?

In classic retail theory, packaging, shelf placement, sales staff and store design all nudge customers towards a purchase. In ecommerce, most of those levers collapse into the humble image gallery. The hero shot, alternate angles and lifestyle images jointly replace the role of handling the product and talking to staff. This is why so many studies now treat images as the main driver of online trust rather than copy or even price differences of a few percent.

From a cognitive point of view, detailed, consistent photos reduce uncertainty. Customers have to imagine fewer “unknowns” about size, texture or colour accuracy. That matters because uncertainty tends to push people either to abandon their basket or to over order “just in case”, generating costly returns. High quality imagery works against both behaviours by showing the item clearly and repeatably under standard lighting, often with a model or hand for scale.

There is also a platform effect. Marketplaces such as Amazon and Zalando rank products partly on engagement and conversion metrics. High performing listings that draw clicks and keep them tend to rise, while fuzzy, badly lit photos drag a listing down. Studies summarised by product photography providers suggest that better images can lift conversion by around 30 percent on large marketplaces, which then improves organic ranking and creates a feedback loop. That loop is exactly what has pushed product photography from creative side project to core growth lever.

Note
In ecommerce, images no longer just influence purchase intent; they feed directly into platform algorithms, shaping visibility, traffic and long term revenue.

Why are mid market brands building in house studios?

A decade ago, professional product photography was mainly outsourced. Brands would ship items to a specialist studio that handled lighting, styling and retouching, then wait for a batch of images. Today, mid market labels in fashion, beauty, homeware and consumer electronics increasingly build dedicated in house studios instead. Guides aimed at ecommerce brands now openly frame in house photography as a way to control costs, speed and brand consistency when product ranges refresh every few weeks.

The economics are straightforward. A mid sized fashion brand might release several hundred new SKUs per season, each needing multiple angles, detail shots and, increasingly, 360 degree views or short clips. Paying studio rates per image or per SKU quickly becomes more expensive than amortising a modest in house set up over several years, especially when the same lighting and backdrop recipes can be reused indefinitely. At the same time, in house teams can reshoot damaged or late arriving items at short notice, which is almost impossible with tight external studio schedules.

There is also a creative control argument. Brands that invest heavily in visual identity want their look and feel reflected consistently across product pages, social media and advertising. External studios are perfectly capable of style guides, but the fastest way to keep art direction aligned is often to place photographers, stylists and merchandisers inside the same building as marketing and ecommerce teams. That is why many content production agencies now advertise “embedded” teams or hybrid models where part of the workflow runs on site.

Note
For brands dealing with high SKU volumes and rapid refresh cycles, in house studios turn photography from a slow external service into an agile, repeatable production line.

How does better photography pay for itself?

From a finance director’s perspective, investing in product photography only makes sense if the returns are quantifiable. Fortunately, the numbers are increasingly clear. If a brand currently converts 2 percent of visitors on a category page and improved images deliver even a 25 to 30 percent relative uplift, the conversion rate moves to around 2.5 to 2.6 percent. On a site with 500,000 monthly visitors and an average order value of 50 pounds, that seemingly small change can add tens of thousands of pounds in incremental revenue each month.

Better photos also reduce returns. When 22 percent of online returns are attributed to products “looking different than expected”, as summarised in Orbitvu’s 2025 trends report, even a modest reduction in that slice can have a large impact on profit, especially in categories with high reverse logistics costs such as furniture or fashion. Add interactive formats like 360 degree spins, which vendors report as increasing conversion and cutting returns by making details clearer, and the ROI curve steepens further.

This is why conversations about product photography increasingly happen alongside discussions of returns policy and inventory strategy. Some brands now model imagery improvements in the same way they would model price promotions: as levers to change conversion rates, return probabilities and average cart size. In that context, spending on lighting, camera bodies or specialist staff is treated not as pure marketing overhead but as investment in unit economics.

Smaller sellers, of course, cannot always afford full studios. Many lean on simple light tents, mirrorless cameras or even modern smartphones, then use an image quality increaser online to compensate for minor exposure or sharpness issues before uploading to marketplaces. Used thoughtfully, these tools help them reach the base technical standards demanded by platforms without eroding margin through constant reshoots.

Note
Once you quantify the combined impact on conversion, returns and basket size, product photography budgets stop looking like a cost centre and start looking like capital expenditure on growth.

Which tools are democratising studio quality images?

The other reason product photography has become a distinct market is the toolchain. Ten years ago, serious studio setups meant heavy continuous lights, DSLRs and complex tethered workflows. Today, affordable LED lighting, compact cameras and browser based editing tools make near studio quality imagery accessible far beyond traditional photo departments. Reports on the ecommerce product photography equipment market estimate that cameras, lighting systems and related software together were worth about 0.16 billion dollars in 2024 and are projected to more than double by 2032.

Within that equipment layer, automation is doing more of the heavy lifting. Companies such as Orbitvu, Ortery and others sell integrated light boxes and turntable systems that can produce consistent 360 degree images in minutes, while AI driven background removal and masking reduces manual retouching time. This is not just about aesthetics; consistency in angles and lighting is what allows customers to compare products quickly and trust that colours are accurate.

For small and medium sized enterprises who cannot buy full systems, the entry point is often cloud software rather than hardware. A retailer might shoot on a basic camera or phone, then run images through an image quality increaser online to denoise, sharpen and upscale them so that they meet marketplace resolution thresholds. Combined with simple background removal and template based cropping, this levels the playing field between small local sellers and large catalogue brands using full studios.

Even brands with in house facilities mix and match. A common pattern is to handle hero shots and key angles in the studio, then rely on user generated content and influencer imagery for social proof. Those rougher photos are still often passed through an image quality increaser online to ensure they do not look jarringly low quality alongside studio assets while retaining their sense of authenticity. The result is an ecosystem where AI enabled tools extend, rather than fully replace, human photographers and stylists.

Note
The toolkit for product imagery is polarising: high end automated studios at one end, lightweight AI powered utilities at the other, with both jointly expanding the market rather than cancelling each other out.

What new jobs are emerging around product imagery?

As product photography has professionalised, so have the roles around it. Traditional job descriptions for studio photographers and retouchers are now joined by hybrid positions such as “visual merchandiser for marketplaces”, “product content specialist” or “digital asset lead”. These roles sit between creative and operational teams, translating brand guidelines into concrete rules about angles, crops, file naming and metadata so that thousands of images can move smoothly through content pipelines.

On marketplaces, visual merchandising is no longer limited to physical store layouts. The same principles of guiding attention, clarifying assortments and reducing friction now apply to product grids and search results. Specialists design thumbnail strategies, test which hero angles drive the most clicks and ensure that variants (for example, size or colour) are presented consistently to prevent confusion. These decisions are tightly coupled to photography, because every new experiment often demands new image crops or compositions.

AI adoption is also reshaping content teams. Many larger organisations now employ content operations managers or AI creative leads who design workflows where routine edits are automated but human review remains in the loop. Job ads for AI content creators and content ops managers routinely mention experience with image generation and editing tools as a core requirement, alongside data literacy and collaboration skills. In that environment, classic “photo editor” roles evolve into something closer to technical art direction, setting rules and reviewing outputs rather than manually pushing sliders all day.

Note
The rise of product photography has created an entire layer of hybrid jobs that sit between art direction, merchandising and operations, with AI skills increasingly part of the baseline.

Conclusion

Product photography’s rise from marginal expense to billion dollar growth market is not really about cameras; it is about risk and trust. When people shop in a browser rather than on a high street, pixels carry the burden of proof that a product is worth buying and will arrive as expected. Market data suggests that brands who take that burden seriously are rewarded with higher conversion rates, fewer returns and stronger marketplace visibility, while those who treat imagery as an afterthought pay for it twice over in lost sales and logistics costs.

For mid market brands, the practical choices now revolve less around “outsourced versus in house” and more around where to place the balance between people, hardware and software. Some will build full studios and content ops teams; others will continue to ship goods to specialist providers; many will sit in the middle, combining modest in house setups with an evolving mix of AI assisted tools. Across all of these models, though, the underlying logic is the same: every time a customer hovers over a thumbnail, zooms into a detail shot or spins a 360 degree view, they are interacting with one of the most powerful levers in your ecommerce P&L.

FAQ

Why is product photography growing into its own market instead of staying a subset of commercial photography?
Specialist reports now track product photography services separately because ecommerce has created dedicated demand, tools and business models. Market estimates show multi decade growth with product related work taking a large share of commercial photography revenue.

Do all brands need an in house studio to compete online?
No. In house studios make most sense for brands with high SKU counts and frequent refreshes. Smaller sellers can still compete by combining basic shooting setups with careful planning and selective use of external studios or cloud based editing tools.

How exactly do better photos reduce product returns?
Clear, accurate images reduce the gap between expectation and reality. Studies summarised by Orbitvu indicate that more than one fifth of returns stem from items looking different from their listing photos; detailed, consistent imagery directly tackles that cause.

What is the difference between a photographer and a visual merchandiser for marketplaces?
Photographers focus on creating the images; visual merchandisers define how those images appear in product grids, search results and detail pages, ensuring consistency and shaping how shoppers navigate ranges. Both roles are increasingly interdependent in ecommerce teams.

Is AI going to replace human product photographers?
Current evidence suggests augmentation rather than replacement. AI speeds up background removal, exposure correction and layout testing, but brands still rely on human photographers, stylists and content leads to set concepts, maintain quality and interpret brand identity.